MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhancing the antitumor response of CD8+ T cells by 4-1BB (CD137) co-stimulation with distinct inactivation of the type 2 adenosine receptors.

2022· article· en· W4313427078 on OpenAlexaff
Jihae Ahn, Siqi Chen, Jie Fan, Bin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdenosine and Purinergic Signaling
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD137T cellCD8Cytotoxic T cellStimulationReceptorCo-stimulationCell biologyAgonistBiologyChemistryMedicineImmune systemEndocrinologyInternal medicineCD28ImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Activating the immune co-stimulatory receptor 4-1BB (CD137) with agonist antibody binding and crosslinking-inducing agents that elicit 4-1BB intracellular signaling potentiates the anti-tumor responses of CD8+ T cells. However, the underlying in-depth mechanisms remain to be defined. The type 2 adenosine receptors (primarily the high affinity receptor, A2AR) predominantly expressed on CD8+ T cells inhibit T cell activation and expansion by blocking TCR signaling in a cAMP-dependent manner. Here, we show that inactivation of the low affinity receptor A2BR rather than A2AR by continuous treatment of antagonists and/or genetic deletion induces superior survival advantage of effector CD8+ T cells with agonistic 4-1BB co-stimulation especially upon chronic TCR stimulation and/or long-term antigen exposure. Mechanistically, A2BR inactivation helps sustain the increased energy and biosynthetic requirements through the accumulation of intracellular glutathione (GSH) in response to agonistic 4-1BB co-stimulation. Importantly, A2BR inactivation in combination with agonistic 4-1BB co-stimulation displays a greater ability to modulate mitochondrial fitness for anti-tumor CD8+ T cell expansion while minimize T cell exhaustion. Thus, the A2BR pathway plays an unexpected role in metabolic reprogramming of GSH upon agonistic 4-1BB co-stimulation that allows the fine-tuning of the anti-tumor responses of CD8+ T cells. Supported by NCI CCSG P30 CA060553 R01CA258857

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicAdenosine and Purinergic SignalingFrench-language works237,207