MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Mycolic acid nanoparticle vaccination leads to antigen persistence and unique differentiation of mycobacterial lipid antigen-specific T cells

2022· article· en· W4313428197 on OpenAlexaff
Eva Morgun, Jennifer Zhu, Sharan Bobbala, Melissa S. Aguilar, Junzhong Wang, Kathleen Conner, Liang Cao, Chetan Seshadri, Evan A. Scott, Chyung‐Ru Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntigenMycobacterium tuberculosisImmune systemVaccinationTuberculosisBiologyCD1MicrobiologyMycolic acidT cellVirologyImmunologyChemistryAntigen-presenting cellMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Tuberculosis remains a serious global epidemic and with the rise of multi-drug resistant strains, an efficacious vaccine solution is imperative. Vaccines currently being developed for Mtb utilize protein antigens, which target MHC-restricted conventional T cells, overlooking the potential of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) lipid antigens such as mycolic acid (MA), a key lipid found in Mtb cell wall. Mycobacterial lipids are presented by group 1 CD1 molecules (CD1a, b, c) to cognate T cells. Group 1 CD1-restricted T cells can be identified in patients with TB and have been shown to provide protection in Mtb infection. Using biocontinuous nanospheres (BCNs), a type of self-assembled nanostructure able to load both hydrophobic and hydrophilic molecules, we have created a vaccine containing MA. We found that MA BCN is able to effectively activate CD1b-restricted MA-specific T cells in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, we discovered that MA persists within lung alveolar macrophages for at least 6 weeks after intratracheal vaccination with MA BCN. Antigen archiving was in part due to the encapsulation of MA within BCN. Nanoparticle vaccinations carrying lipid antigens may thus lead to persistent depots of antigen that could offer long-lasting immune response and protection. Supported by grants from NIH (5R01AI145345-03, 1F30AI157314-01, 5T32GM008152-35)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→