De echte prijs (true price) van mosselen : Echte en eerlijke prijs van duurzame producten – casus mosselen Module natuurlijk kapitaal (water, bodem en lucht)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mussels are known by their low footprint compared to other (in particular animal) protein sources like chicken, pork, beef or other fish species (including shellfish and crustaceans). The key research question is: what is the contribution to the natural capital by the Dutch mussel production and consumption and which economic value (in euros) could be accounted to this contribution? The calculated true price for Dutch mussels is € 4,762 (2021) per kilogram of which € 0,47 climate costs.The positive contributions (true value) by mussels to natural capital via water purification and enriching biodiversity are cumulative monetarized in the total true price as € 0,14 per kilogram of Dutch mussels presented in the consumer market. The methodology of true pricing is based on existing Life Cycle Analysis (LCA). This methodology relies on international standards and scientific literature. Noteworthy is that there is a deviation within this study from the standard approach of true price calculations as the societal benefits and -costs are cumulated to one net true price.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.095 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".