Impact of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in glycogen storage disease type Ib: A single-subject research design using 13C-glucose breath test
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glycogen storage disease type Ib (GSD Ib) is an autosomal recessively inherited deficiency of the glucose-6-phosphate translocase (G6PT). Clinical features include a combination of a metabolic phenotype (fasting hypoglycemia, lactic acidosis, hepatomegaly) and a hematologic phenotype with neutropenia and neutrophil dysfunction. Dietary treatment involves provision of starches such as uncooked cornstarch (UCCS) and Glycosade® to provide prolonged enteral supply of glucose. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the treatment of choice for neutropenia. Because long-term stimulation of hematopoiesis with G-CSF causes serious complications such as splenomegaly, hypersplenism, and osteopenia; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been considered in some patients with GSD Ib to correct neutropenia and avoid G-CSF related adverse effects. Whether HSCT also has an effect on the metabolic phenotype and utilization of carbohydrate sources has not been determined. Our objective was to measure the utilization of starch in a patient with GSD Ib before and after HSCT using the minimally invasive 13C-glucose breath test (13C-GBT). A case of GSD Ib (18y; female) underwent 13C-GBT four times: UCCS (pre-HSCT), UCCS (3, 5 months post-HSCT) and Glycosade® (6 months post-HSCT) with a dose of 80 g administered via nasogastric tube after a 4 h fast according to our patient's fasting tolerance. Breath samples were collected at baseline and every 30 min for 240 min. Rate of CO2 production was measured at 120 min using indirect calorimetry. Finger-prick blood glucose was measured using a glucometer hourly to test hypoglycemia (glucose <4 mmol/L). Biochemical and clinical data were obtained from the medical records as a post-hoc chart review. UCCS utilization was significantly higher in GSD Ib pre-HSCT, which reduced and stabilized 5 months post-HSCT. UCCS and Glycosade® utilizations were low and not different at 5 and 6 months post-HSCT. Blood glucose concentrations were not significantly different at any time point. Findings show that HSCT stabilized UCCS utilization, as reflected by lower and stable glucose oxidation. The results also illustrate the application of 13C-GBT to examine glucose metabolism in response to various carbohydrate sources after other treatment modalities like HSCT in GSD Ib.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".