MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313472125 · doi:10.3390/catal13010077

Catalytic Activation of Hydrogen Peroxide Using Highly Porous Hydrothermally Modified Manganese Catalysts for Removal of Azithromycin Antibiotic from Aqueous Solution

2022· article· en· W4313472125 on OpenAlexaff
Fatemeh Hasanpour, Javad Saien, Omid Norouzi

Bibliographic record

VenueCatalysts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced oxidation water treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisHydrogen peroxideChemistryInorganic chemistryManganeseCalcinationAqueous solutionNuclear chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen peroxide catalytic activation holds great promise in the treatment of persistent pollutants. In this study, the novel Mn-Acacair/Al, Mn-Acacarg/Al and Mn-BTCarg/Al catalysts, supported on Al2O3, were applied for rapid hydrogen peroxide activation and azithromycin antibiotic removal. The catalysts were prepared by the calcination-hydrothermal method under air or argon atmosphere. The characterization confirmed that the modification of manganese with acetylacetonate and benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid (H3BTC) O-donor ligands highly improves the catalyst porosity, amorphousity, and abundance of coordinately unsaturated sites, which facilitate the generation of reactive oxygen species. The hydrogen peroxide activation and azithromycin removal reached 98.4% and 99.3% after 40 min using the Mn-BTCarg/Al catalyst with incredible stability and reusability. Only a 5.2% decrease in activity and less than 2% manganese releasing in solutions were detected after five regeneration cycles under the optimum operating conditions. The removal intermediates were identified by LC-MS/MS analysis, and the pathways were proposed. The hydroxylation and decarboxylation reactions play a key role in the degradation reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCatalystsSame topicAdvanced oxidation water treatmentFrench-language works237,207