Comparison of the Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) Tumour Microenvironment to Other Solid Malignancies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of skin cancer, contributing to nearly a third of new cancer cases in Western countries. Most BCCs are considered low risk "routine" lesions that can either be excised through surgery or treated with chemotherapeutic agents. However, around 1-2% of BCC cases are locally aggressive, present a high risk of metastasis, and often develop chemoresistance, termed advanced BCC. There currently exists no animal model or cell line that can recapitulate advanced BCC, let alone intermediate-risk and high-risk early BCC. We previously found that aggressive BCC tumours presented a Th2 cytokine inflammation profile, mesenchymal stem cell properties, and macrophage-induced tumoral inflammation. In this study, we aimed to identify potential BCC "relatives" among solid-organ malignancies who present similar immune cell proportions in their microenvironment compositions. Using immune cell type deconvolution by CIBERSORTx, and cell type enrichment by xCell, we determined three cancers with the most similar tumour microenvironments as compared to BCC. Specifically, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, sarcoma, and skin cutaneous melanoma presented significance in multiple cell types, namely in CD4+ T lymphocytes, gammadelta T lymphocytes, and NK cell populations. Consequently, further literature analysis was conducted to understand similarities between BCC and its "relatives", as well as investigating novel treatment targets. By identifying cancers most like BCC, we hope to propose prospective druggable pathways, as well as to gain insight on developing a reliable animal or cell line model to represent advanced BCC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".