Influence of biosafety protocols adopted for the prevention of <scp>SARS‐CoV</scp>‐2 in slaughterhouses and a positive effect on the reduction of <scp><i>Staphylococcus aureus</i></scp> presence in beef cuts
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Staphylococcus aureus is a food quality indicator microorganism commonly found in human mucous membranes. With the emergence of the virus related to SARS‐CoV‐2, several prevention protocols were established. Therefore, this study assessed whether the adoption of SARS‐CoV‐2 protocols influenced the presence of S. aureus in beef samples. We analyzed the S. aureus results of 3654 beef samples between April and September 2019 and 2020. Mean percentages of the population of S. aureus were different between years (2.63%—2019; 1.13%—2020), revealing that after the adoption of the SARS‐CoV‐2 protocols there was a decrease in the presence of S. aureus . Concomitantly, a significant difference was also presented in the annual means of S. aureus load counts (2.30 log of CFU/g in 2019, and 1.60 log of CFU/g in 2020), of the sets of beef samples analyzed. Therefore, we suggest that the measures used to prevent SARS‐CoV‐2 can continue to be applied even after the pandemic, especially in the stages that involve beef handling in slaughterhouses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it