Successful ABO incompatible heart transplantation after desensitization therapy in an older child
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: ABO-incompatible heart transplantation (HTx) has become a standard procedure for children below 2 years of age due to an immunologically immature immune system and associated low isohemagglutinin titers. METHODS: We report a case of an ABO-incompatible HTx (recipient blood group O, donor blood group A) at the age of 5 years and 11 months with a fully matured immune system and previously high isohemagglutinin titers that diminished as a result of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) desensitization therapy with rituximab and immunoglobulins. RESULTS: The anti-A titer at the time of HTx was 1:16 with post-transplant isoagglutinin titers never exceeding 1:4 without any signs of rejection with now 3 years of post-HTx follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ABO isohemagglutinin titers should be routinely assessed in children undergoing desensitization therapy since ABOi transplantation can be considered in selected cases to expand the donor pool with the option of crossing the ABO barrier to find a better-matched allograft.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".