MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313489603 · doi:10.1155/2023/3528377

Mixed Epithelial and Stromal Tumor: A Rare Renal Neoplasm—Case Report with Clinicopathologic Features and Review of the Literature

2023· article· en· W4313489603 on OpenAlexaff
Mukund Tinguria, Katherine Chorneyko

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Reports in Pathology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsJoseph Brant Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologyMedicineAtypiaCytokeratinCystStromal tumorCuboidal CellNephrectomyStromal cellDifferential diagnosisKidneyEpitheliumInternal medicineImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mixed epithelial and stromal tumor (MEST) is a rare benign renal neoplasm composed of epithelial and stromal components. Here, we report a 61-year-old woman presenting with a left complex cystic renal mass. The lesion was found incidentally on ultrasound for abdominal discomfort. CT scan and MRI showed a 7.4 cm complex cystic lesion in the left kidney. The differential diagnoses included complex renal cyst and cystic renal cell carcinoma. Laparoscopic nephrectomy showed a large 7.5 cm multicystic tumor with thick and thin septae and smooth walled-cysts containing clear watery fluid. Histologic examination showed variable sized cysts lined by flattened, cuboidal to columnar epithelium with focal hobnailing. No significant cytologic atypia or mitoses were noted. The cyst lining epithelium was positive for CK7 and high molecular weight cytokeratin (34Be12). The stroma was positive for alpha smooth muscle actin, CD10, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor. This report contributes an additional case to our collective knowledge of these lesions and summarizes the literature around these rare neoplasms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCase Reports in PathologySame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207