HEALTH INSURANCE AND ITS REGULATION IN REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With development of economy and society, high production and economic relations are almost impossible to imagine without the insurance. With connection between goods and financial transaction and appearance of class in human society, begins a period of insurance which is, during its path of development, experienced numerous changes, but in essence its basic function remind the same- protection of persons and property. Necessity of insurance is evident and proved whit the fact that it is in constant improvement beside the character of socio-economic and political relations. Without regard to the socio-political system, basic functions of insurance remind universal and of extreme importance for each and every society. Social insurance appeared at the end of XIX century and in 1883. it was brought into Germany. After that it was accepted in Austria, Norway, Holland, Luxembourg, Finland, Hungary and England, and in XX century, in the thirties, in United States of America, Canada and in countries of South America. After the II World War social insurance became acceptable in majority countries in Africa, Asia and other parts of the world. This insurance in Serbia appeared in 1922. at the time when The Labor Law was passed. In the mean time system of social insurance was constantly improving, so today it is very different from the initial forms. Modern system of social insurance is known for protection which provides material and social security in case of health problems, lack of work capability, old age and unemployment. Basic forms of social insurance are: health insurance, disability insurance, old-age benefits and insurance in case of unemployment. This scientific work will be focusing on one aspect of social insurance – health insurance and in the way of its regulation in Republic of Serbia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".