MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Learning Based Parametrization of Diffeomorphic Image Registration for the Application of Cardiac Image Segmentation

2022· article· en· W4313525682 on OpenAlexaff
Ameneh Sheikhjafari, Deepa Krishnaswamy, Michelle Noga, Nilanjan Ray, Kumaradevan Punithakumar

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Hospital Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceSegmentationHausdorff distanceDiffeomorphismComputer visionComputer scienceDeep learningParametrization (atmospheric modeling)Image segmentationTransformation (genetics)Image registrationPattern recognition (psychology)Rigid transformationImage (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiac segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the essential tasks to analyze the anatomy and function of the heart for the assessment and diagnosis of cardiac diseases. However, manual annotation is difficult and time consuming. This study proposes a novel end-to-end supervised cardiac MRI segmentation framework based on a diffeomorphic deformable registration that can segment the left ventricle from 2D and 3D images or volumes. In order to represent the actual cardiac deformation, the methodology parameterizes the transformation using radial and rotational components, computed using a deep learning approach The method was evaluated over three different data sets and showed significant improvements compared to exacting learning and non-learning based methods in terms of the Dice score and Hausdorff distance metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207