MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313535076 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2023.3234469

Explicitly Solvable Continuous-Time Inference for Partially Observed Markov Processes

2022· preprint· en· W4313535076 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel T. Chen, Alexander Strang, Andrew W. Eckford, Peter J. Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Science Foundation of Sri LankaNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsConditional probabilityMathematicsMarkov processRegular conditional probabilityDiscrete time and continuous timeMarkov chainInferenceHidden Markov modelVariable-order Markov modelMarkov modelApplied mathematicsConditional probability distributionAlgorithmMarkov propertyComputer scienceRandom variableProbability mass functionArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many natural and engineered systems can be modeled as discrete state Markov processes. Often, only a subset of states are directly observable. Inferring the conditional probability that a system occupies a particular hidden state, given the partial observation, is a problem with broad application. In this paper, we introduce a continuous-time formulation of the sum-product algorithm, which is a well-known discrete-time method for finding the hidden states' conditional probabilities, given a set of finite, discrete-time observations. From our new formulation, we can explicitly solve for the conditional probability of occupying any state, given the transition rates and observations within a finite time window. We apply our algorithm to a realistic model of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein for exact inference of the conditional occupancy probability, given a finite time series of partial observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicGene Regulatory Network AnalysisFrench-language works237,207