Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To determine the causes of interventions in patients with acute limb ischemia (ALI), the time lapse of presentation, and the outcome.Study Design: An observational study.Methodology: All delayed acute limb ischemia cases (presenting later than 6 hours after the onset of symptoms) were included in the study.Cases of ALI secondary to accidental trauma were excluded except those of iatrogenic trauma like patients with intravenous drug abuse and intra-arterial accidental drug infiltration.Patients' demographic data, clinical history, aetiology, examination findings, and treatment data; including type of surgery, level of amputation, adjunctive treatment were recorded.Results: Total number of delayed ALI cases was 147.Mean age was 59.52 17.77 years.Seventy-five (51%) were females while 72(49%) were males.The right lower limb was involved in 56(38%) cases.A hundred (68%) thromboembolectomies were successful and limbs were saved, while 19(12.9%)had failure after the procedure.Three (2%) patients expired within 24 hours of thromboembolectomy.Twenty-five (17%) had frank gangrene at presentation and ended up in amputations while 122 (82.9%) had questionable viability and underwent limb salvage procedures.Conclusion: Delayed presentation of ALI is very common; timely management with effective thromboembolectomies can save limbs in most of the patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".