MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313544529 · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000853

A Prospective Cohort Study of the Association Between Preinjury Psychosocial Function and Postconcussive Symptoms in Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An A-CAP Study

2022· article· en· W4313544529 on OpenAlexafffund
Quynh Doan, Leah Chadwick, Ken Tang, Brian L. Brooks, Miriam H. Beauchamp, Roger Zemek, William Craig, Jocelyn Gravel, Keith Owen Yeates

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPsychosocialConcussionMedicineTraumatic brain injuryPopulationCohortProspective cohort studyStrengths and Difficulties QuestionnairePoison controlHead injuryInjury preventionPhysical therapyInjury Severity ScoreClinical psychologyPsychologyPsychiatryMental healthEmergency medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the moderating effect of preinjury psychosocial function on postconcussion symptoms for children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). DESIGN, SETTING, AND POPULATION: We conducted a prospective cohort study of children ages 8.0 to 16.9 years with mTBI ( n = 633) or orthopedic injury (OI; n = 334), recruited from 5 pediatric emergency departments from September 2016 to December 2018. MAIN MEASURES: Participants completed baseline assessments within 48 hours of injury, and postconcussion symptoms assessments at 7 to 10 days, weekly to 3 months, and biweekly to 6 months post-injury. Preinjury psychosocial function was measured using parent ratings on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), retrospectively evaluating their child's status prior to the injury. Parent and child ratings on the Health and Behavior Inventory (HBI) (cognitive and somatic subscales) and the Post-Concussion Symptom Interview (PCS-I) were used as measures of postconcussion symptoms. We fitted 6 longitudinal regression models, which included 747 to 764 participants, to evaluate potential interactions between preinjury psychosocial function and injury group as predictors of child- and parent-reported postconcussion symptoms. RESULTS: Preinjury psychosocial function moderated group differences in postconcussion symptoms across the first 6 months post-injury. Higher emotional and conduct problems were significantly associated with more severe postconcussion symptoms among children with mTBI compared with OI. Wald's χ 2 for interaction terms (injury group × SDQ subscales) ranged from 6.3 to 10.6 ( P values <.001 to .043) across parent- and child-reported models. In contrast, larger group differences (mTBI > OI) in postconcussion symptoms were associated with milder hyperactivity (Wald's χ 2 : 15.3-43.0, all P < .001), milder peer problems (Wald's χ 2 : 11.51, P = .003), and higher social functioning (Wald's χ 2 : 12.435, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Preinjury psychosocial function moderates postconcussion symptoms in pediatric mTBI, highlighting the importance of assessing preinjury psychosocial function in children with mTBI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.686

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Head Trauma RehabilitationSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207