MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313563857 · doi:10.2475/08.2022.01

The Assabet barcode: Mesoproterozoic detrital zircons in Neoproterozoic strata from Mauritania, West Africa

2022· article· en· W4313563857 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCratonZirconGeologyRodiniaGeochemistryPaleontologyPopulationSupercontinentTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detrital zircon data are reported from Mesoproterozoic to Ordovician strata from two tectonic domains in Mauritania: 14 samples from the Taoudeni Basin of the West African Craton and 15 samples from the Mauritanide orogen. Taoudeni Basin samples show four sequential, distinctive detrital zircon age distributions, which we refer to as “barcodes”. From old to young these are the Char, Assabet, Téniagouri, and Oujeft barcodes, each named for a constituent stratigraphic unit. Zircon age maxima are as follows, with the dominant ones in italics. The Char barcode, from Mesoproterozoic (<i>ca.</i> 1100 Ma) strata including the Char Group, yielded zircon age maxima at 2941, 2871, 2703, <i>2447</i>, <i>2076</i>, and <i>2041</i> Ma, all potentially traceable to sources in the West African Craton. The Assabet barcode is from strata, including the eponymous Assabet el Hassiane Group, that were deposited between <i>ca</i>. 883 and <i>ca.</i> 570 Ma; it has age maxima at 2137, 2053, 1769, 1510, <i>1212</i>, 1021, and 936 Ma and a pronounced minimum during Geon 16 (1699–1600 Ma). The Assabet9s Mesoproterozoic to early Neoproterozoic zircons cannot have come from the West African Craton or any of its surrounding orogens. The Téniagouri barcode, which takes its name from the Téniagouri Group, was deposited at <i>ca.</i> 569 Ma; it has dominant maxima at 1983, 1872, <i>1522</i>, <i>1215</i>, 1109, 988, and 601 Ma and resembles the Assabet barcode but with the addition of the youngest population. The Oujeft barcode, named for the Oujeft Group, is from strata deposited between 541 or slightly earlier and 444 Ma or younger, has age maxima at 2124, 2053, 1197, <i>624</i> and <i>579</i> Ma. The Téniagouri and Oujeft barcodes record input from Pan-African orogens. In the Mauritanide orogen, most of the metasedimentary rock units that were sampled yielded detrital zircon age spectra that match one of the Taoudeni Basin barcodes. These results imply new depositional age constraints based on barcode correlation and suggest affinities between Mauritanide strata and the West African Craton. Detrital zircon age distributions that broadly resemble the Assabet barcode occur in the Neoproterozoic of Morocco, Ghana, Greece, Russia, Brazil, and, in the Appalachian orogen of Canada and the United States, Avalonia and Ganderia. The recent Rodinia reconstruction of Evans (2021) restores these far-flung localities to a more compact area, with Avalonia, Ganderia, and other peri-Gondwanan terranes occupying an oblong area between Amazonia, Laurentia, Baltica, and West Africa. Our preferred explanation is that most of these places received detritus via the same continent-scale fluvial system as the West African craton. Among the craton9s nearest Rodinia neighbors in the Evans (2021) reconstruction for 900 Ma, Amazonia has known igneous rocks corresponding to all of the major Assabet age populations, and also a lull, though not a complete magmatic gap, during Geon 16. This is consistent with overall north-directed paleocurrents in the Assabet El Hassiane Group and its correlatives on the West African Craton.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it