MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhanced progesterone support during stimulated cycles of transvaginal follicular aspiration improves bovine in vitro embryo production

2023· article· en· W4313593036 on OpenAlexaff
R.J. Simmons, D.A.R. Tutt, Gizem Guven-Ates, Wing Yee Kwong, Rémi Labrecque, F. Randi, Kevin D. Sinclair

Bibliographic record

VenueTheriogenology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilDirectorate for Biological Sciences
KeywordsGerminal vesicleCorpus luteumFollicular phaseEstrous cycleLuteolysisInternal medicineBiologyLuteal phaseEndocrinologyAndrologyOocyteIn vitro fertilisationBlastocystFollicleEmbryoOvaryEmbryogenesisMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The in vitro production (IVP) of cattle embryos requires that germinal-vesicle stage oocytes undergo a period of maturation in vitro prior to fertilization and culture to the blastocyst stage. Success of IVP in taurine cattle is enhanced following ovarian stimulation prior to oocyte retrieval (OPU), particularly if preceded by a short period of FSH withdrawal (‘coasting’). However, evidence regarding the importance of progesterone (P4) support during OPU-IVP is equivocal. The current study, therefore, determined the effects of increased peripheral P4 concentrations during FSH-stimulated (‘coasted’) cycles of OPU. Progesterone support was provided by either an active corpus luteum (CL) and/or one of two intravaginal P4 releasing devices (i.e., CIDR® [1.38 g P4] or PRID® Delta [1.55 g P4]). Expt. 1 established an initial estrus prior to OPU, allowing CL formation (single luteal phase) spanning the first two of five cycles of OPU; the remaining three cycles were supported by either a CIDR® or PRID® Delta. Expt. 2 commenced with two cycles of dominant follicle removal (including prostaglandin F2α) undertaken seven days apart prior to six cycles of OPU. The absence of a CL meant that these cycles were supported only by a CIDR® or PRID® Delta. As each experiment involved several sequential cycles of OPU, the cumulative effects of device use on vaginal discharges were also assessed. Each experiment involved 10 sexually mature Holstein heifers. In the absence of a CL, peak plasma P4 concentrations were greater (P = 0.002) for the PRID® Delta (4.3 ± 0.22) than for the CIDR® (2.9 ± 0.22). In Expt. 1 there was an interaction (P < 0.05) between CL presence at OPU and P4 device on Day 8 blastocyst yields, indicating an effect of P4 device only when the CL was absent. The percentage hatching/hatched blastocysts of matured oocytes for the CIDR® and PRID® Delta was 44.3 ± 5.04 and 41.0 ± 5.40 in the presence, and 17.1 ± 3.48 and 42.2 ± 3.76 in the absence, of a CL (P = 0.018). Combined analyses of data from Expt. 1 and 2, when no CL was present, confirmed that Day 8 blastocyst yields were greater (P = 0.022) for the PRID® Delta than the CIDR®. Vaginal discharge scores were higher (P < 0.001) for the PRID® Delta than the CIDR® in Expt. 1 but not in Expt 2; however scores were low, did not increase with repeated use, and thus were deemed of no clinical or welfare concern. In conclusion, enhanced P4 support during FSH-stimulated cycles of OPU-IVP can improve in vitro embryo development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheriogenologySame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207