Cryogenic storage increases the longevity of butternut (Juglans cinerea, L.) seed embryogenic axes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Butternut (Juglans cinerea L.), a species listed as endangered, is currently undergoing rapid decline due to habitat loss and the introduction of Ophiognomonia clavigignenti-juglandacearum, a non-native pathogen causing butternut canker. The decline of butternut has led to the development of cryobiological methods for the ex-situ conservation of the species since viability is not maintained using conventional methods. In this study, we assess the survivability and growth of butternut embryogenic axes into plantlets after 7 years of cryopreservation. Results show that cryopreservation is a highly effective method for the long-term storage of embryogenic axes since both survival and subsequent acclimatization into plantlets was successful with an average of 76% survival and 71% acclimatization, respectively. These results surpass the actual duration viability for non-cryogenic storage of butternut seed and we hope that future testing will result in longer term success of this cryobiological method and provide much needed germplasm for future restoration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".