MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313622142 · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2022.12.001

Effect of perioperative benzodiazepine use on intraoperative awareness and postoperative delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies

2023· review· en· W4313622142 on OpenAlexafffund
Eugene Wang, Emilie P. Belley‐Côté, Jack Young, Henry He, Haris Saud, Frédérick D’Aragon, Kevin J. Um, Waleed Alhazzani, Joshua Piticaru, Matthew Hedden, Richard Whitlock, C. David Mazer, Hessam H. Kashani, Sarah Y. Zhang, Amanda Lucas, Nicholas Timmerman, Cameron Nishi, Davinder Jain, Aaron Kugler, Chris Beaver, Shelley Kloppenburg, Sam Schulman, Flávia K. Borges, Morvarid Kavosh, Chihiro Wada, Sabrina H. Lin, Serena Sibilio, Mandy N. Lauw, Alexander P. Benz, Wojciech Szczeklik, Arastoo Mokhtari, Eric Jacobsohn, Jessica Spence

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Anaesthesia · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of TorontoSheridan CollegeTrillium Health CentreUniversity of ManitobaSt. Michael's HospitalMcMaster UniversityQueen's UniversityMcGill UniversityImpactThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research InstitutePopulation Health Research Institute
FundersCanadian Anesthesia Research FoundationHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsObservational studyPerioperativeDeliriumMeta-analysisBenzodiazepineMedicineRandomized controlled trialAnesthesiaIntensive care medicineSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.179
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.179
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0420.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.228
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of AnaesthesiaSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207