MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313641213 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2438537/v1

Advancements in rock block volume calculation by analytical method for geological engineering applications

2023· preprint· en· W4313641213 on OpenAlexafffund
Aboubacar Sidiki Koulibaly, Alireza Shahbazi, Ali Saeidi, Alain Rouleau, Marco Quirion, Romain Chesnaux

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHydro-Québec
KeywordsRock mass classificationBlock (permutation group theory)Volume (thermodynamics)AlgorithmComputer scienceJoint (building)Orientation (vector space)Rock mechanicsGeologyMathematical optimizationGeotechnical engineeringMathematicsGeometryStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The shape, the volume, and the distribution of the rock blocks represent important geomechanical factors of a rock mass behavior in engineering works. Several methods have been developed for estimating these parameters, including numerical models, as well as analytical and empirical methods. However, their determination in actual in-situ conditions can be quite challenging. The existing analytical methods show limitations in determining the in-situ rock blocks volume. Numerical models provide more reliable estimates of these parameters, but they are not accessible to all, and they require a good working knowledge. Increasing the accuracy of existing analytical methods, or developing more reliable and accessible methods, are more realistic approaches to obtain better estimates of rock block volumes. This paper presents a new method to obtain more accurate estimates of in-situ rock block volume. The method is developed for rock a mass consisting of three persistent joint sets, each set having constant spacing and orientation values. It is based on vector products to obtain exact block volumes, an improvement as compared to previous methods. The volumes of the rock blocks are calculated through the multiplication of the blocks’ edge vector. The results of the developed equation are validated with the output of numerical simulations using 3DEC version 7.0 software, and the results indicate that the developed method makes it possible to determine in-situ rock block volume more reliably than the existing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207