MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313645222 · doi:10.1094/pdis-08-22-1940-pdn

First Report of <i>Phytophthora gonapodyides</i> Causing Root Rot on Raspberry in Canada

2023· article· en· W4313645222 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rishi R. Burlakoti, Sanjib Sapkota, Mark Lubberts, Kurt Lamour

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlowing a raspberryRubusWiltingBiologyRoot rotAgricultureCropPhytophthoraPlant diseaseHorticultureLibrary scienceGeographyAgronomyEcologyBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) is an economically important fruit crop in Canada and about 80% of red raspberries are cultivated in British Columbia. In 2018, foliar symptoms associated with root rot and wilting complex disease were observed in raspberry field of Fraser Valley areas of British Columbia. Plants were stunted with reduced numbers of primocanes. Chlorosis and necrosis on leaves and partial wilting of branches were observed. When plants were uprooted, necrosis and browning on roots were observed. Two isolates of oomycetes pathogen were isolated using baiting with rhododendron leaves and pear fruit as described in Sapkota et al. 2022. Using FastDNA Spin kit (MP Biomedical, Burlingame, CA), genomic DNA of pathogen isolates was extracted from mycelia cultured on 20% clarified V8 agar medium amended with 10 mg pimaricin, 250 mg ampicillin, 10 mg rifampicin (V8PAR) per liter following the manufacturer's standard protocol. Pathogens were identified using colony morphology on 20% clarified V8 PAR as well as internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing with ITS1 primers (White et al. 1990) and multiplex targeted-sequencing with degenerate primers of three nuclear genes: heat shock protein90 (HSP90), elongation factor 1 alpha (EF1α) and beta tubulin (βtub). BLAST searches of ITS sequences of isolates of this study (accession nos. OP180065, OP180066) in NCBI GenBank showed 98.5 to 99.6% identity with the ITS sequence of P. gonapodyides (accession nos. MN513238.1, MG753496.1). Multiplex targeted sequencing also identified both isolates as a P. gonapodyides (accession nos. SRR20227809, SRR20227807) when mapped with the reference sequences (accession nos. HSP90: KX251233.1, EF1α: KX251231.1, β-tub: KX639710.1). Pathogenicity was confirmed by inoculating mycelial suspension of one isolate of P. gonapodyides on root of intact plants and mycelial plugs of two isolates on detached stems of the raspberry plants, 'Chemainus' in the greenhouse using methods described in Sapkota et al. 2022. Two experiments were conducted with three replicates in each test. Experiments were arranged using completely randomized design. In detached stem assays, distinct dark-lesion symptom appeared at 7 to 9 days after inoculation while uninoculated control stems remained asymptomatic. Intact plants showed wilting and foliar symptoms 15 days after inoculation and progressed higher at 4 to 5 weeks after inoculation. Root infection with dark brown to black color was observed when roots were assessed at 5 weeks after inoculation. The diseased root and crown tissues tested positive for Phytophthora in Agdia ImmunoStrip and P. gonapodyides was re-isolated and confirmed with multiplex-targeted sequencing. Phytophthora gonapodyides was previously reported from raspberry in Chile (Wilcox and Latorre 2002). To our best knowledge, this is the first report of P. gonapodyides infecting red raspberry in British Columbia, Canada. The detection of new Phytophthora species on raspberry may become a new potential problem to growers in addition to P. rubi, which is already a major cause of raspberry decline in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Pathogens and ResistanceFrench-language works237,207