MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313645999 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.170827

Public Interest Development in Indonesia: Considerations Regarding Land Acquisition and Its Impact on the Environment

2022· article· en· W4313645999 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muhtadi Muhtadi, Nia Kurniati, Indra Prawira, Somawijaya

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProsperityNatural resourcePublic interestSustainabilitySanitationGovernment (linguistics)Environmental planningConstitutionPoliticsPublic participationBusinessEnvironmental resource managementEconomic growthPolitical scienceEconomicsPublic administrationLawEngineeringGeographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Bener Dam in Purworejo Regency is an unpleasant portrayal of the government's and local government's abilities to develop for the public good in response to the public interest development challenge. If the environmental implications of development are not taken into account, the local ecosystem will be negatively affected. This study employed both a statutory and conceptual approach to normative jurisprudential law research. According to Article 33, paragraph 3 of the Indonesian Constitution of 1945, "Earth, water, and natural resources contained therein are controlled by the state and used for the greatest prosperity of the people," Earth, water, and natural resources contained therein are used for the greatest prosperity of the people. This is the essential principle underlying development that serves the public interest, including the construction of public highways, toll roads, railroads, drinking/clean water lines, sewers, sanitation, and reservoirs. This pertains to every one of these initiatives. Even while environmental sustainability is an essential component of public-interest development, it is equally essential to consider the political, economic, and sociocultural factors that influence the environmental sustainability of a project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.010
Scholarly communication0.0120.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicLegal and Policy Analysis in IndonesiaFrench-language works237,207