Post-Stroke Insomnia Increased the Risk of Cognitive Impairments: A Hospital-Based Retrospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives/Background Insomnia is a common sleep complaint among patients who had a stroke and has been recognized as an independent risk factor for cognitive impairment. However, the relationship between poststroke insomnia and cognitive impairment over time is under-researched. Therefore, we examined the association between poststroke insomnia and the risk of cognitive impairment.Participants Stroke participants who had a stroke and were 20 years and olderMethods This multicenter hospital-based retrospective cohort study with a 13-year follow-up period (2004–2017). The diagnosis of stroke, insomnia, and cognitive impairment was based on the International Classification of Diseases. The study participants who experienced a stroke were divided into two cohorts: those who also had insomnia and those who did not have insomnia. A Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used.Results A total of 1,775 patients with a mean age of 67.6 years were included. Of these patients, 146 and 75 patients were diagnosed with insomnia and cognitive impairment during the follow-up period, respectively. The cumulative incidence of cognitive impairment in the stroke with insomnia cohort was significantly lower than that in the stroke without insomnia cohort (log-rank test, P < .001). The adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the stroke with insomnia cohort indicated a higher risk of cognitive impairment compared with the stroke without insomnia cohort (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.41–4.03).Conclusions Patients who had a stroke and were diagnosed with insomnia exhibited a substantial increased risk of cognitive impairment over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".