Post-Stroke Insomnia Increased the Risk of Cognitive Impairments: A Hospital-Based Retrospective Cohort Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives/Background Insomnia is a common sleep complaint among patients who had a stroke and has been recognized as an independent risk factor for cognitive impairment. However, the relationship between poststroke insomnia and cognitive impairment over time is under-researched. Therefore, we examined the association between poststroke insomnia and the risk of cognitive impairment.Participants Stroke participants who had a stroke and were 20 years and olderMethods This multicenter hospital-based retrospective cohort study with a 13-year follow-up period (2004–2017). The diagnosis of stroke, insomnia, and cognitive impairment was based on the International Classification of Diseases. The study participants who experienced a stroke were divided into two cohorts: those who also had insomnia and those who did not have insomnia. A Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used.Results A total of 1,775 patients with a mean age of 67.6 years were included. Of these patients, 146 and 75 patients were diagnosed with insomnia and cognitive impairment during the follow-up period, respectively. The cumulative incidence of cognitive impairment in the stroke with insomnia cohort was significantly lower than that in the stroke without insomnia cohort (log-rank test, P < .001). The adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the stroke with insomnia cohort indicated a higher risk of cognitive impairment compared with the stroke without insomnia cohort (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.41–4.03).Conclusions Patients who had a stroke and were diagnosed with insomnia exhibited a substantial increased risk of cognitive impairment over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it