MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313706985 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxac097

A 16-year-old boy with lower extremity muscle wasting and pain

2023· article· en· W4313706985 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mona Hnaini, Leandro Cardarelli‐Leite, Tim Carey, Craig Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLibrary scienceHistoryPediatricsFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article A 16-year-old boy with lower extremity muscle wasting and pain Get access Mona Hnaini, MD, Mona Hnaini, MD Department of Paediatrics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Leandro Cardarelli Leite, MD, Leandro Cardarelli Leite, MD Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Tim Carey, MD FRCSC, Tim Carey, MD FRCSC Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Craig Campbell, MD MSc FRCPC Craig Campbell, MD MSc FRCPC Department of Paediatrics, Clinical Neurological Sciences and Epidemiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada Correspondence: Craig Campbell, Department of Paediatrics, Clinical Neurological Sciences and Epidemiology, Western University, 800 Commissioners Road East, London, Ontario N6A5W9, Canada. Telephone 5196858500 ext.: 57455, fax 5196858350, E-mail craig.campbell@lhsc.on.ca Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Paediatrics & Child Health, Volume 28, Issue 2, May 2023, Pages 69–71, https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxac097 Published: 06 January 2023 Article history Received: 12 December 2021 Accepted: 19 August 2022 Published: 06 January 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207