Effects of Oxidative Damage during Ruesi Dadton Exercise in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
International Journal of Exercise Science 15(3): 1528-1537, 2022. This study aimed to investigate the effect of biomarkers of oxidative stress (OS) in 8-isoprostane (8-iso) and 8-hydroxy-2'–deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) during a 12-week Ruesi Dadton (RD) exercise. A total of 274 enrolled participants were classified into blocks based on age and formal educational years, and randomly assigned into two groups: RD and control (CON). The participants’ cognitive functions were tested using Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores to screen for MCI. Urine samples of approximately 30 mL were collected from both groups pre- and post-intervention. All participants signed consent forms before participating in the program. Participants in the RD group were instructed to perform 15 postures of RD exercise in 60 min, three times a week for 12 weeks. A 2 x 2 (group x time) repeated multivariate analysis, with MoCA score, 8-iso, and 8-OH-dG as covariates, was performed to analyze the between-subject differences across group [V = 0.143, F(2,60) = 5.020, p = 0.010, d = 0.209] and within-subject differences across interaction between group [V = 0.143, F(2,60) = 5.020, p = 0.010, d = 0.408]. There were significant differences from univariate data regarding both 8-iso (F1,61 = 10.081, P = 0.002, d = 0.406) and 8-OH-dG (F(1,61) = 5.965, P = 0.018, d = 0.312) levels. Moreover, results from both biomarkers in the RD group revealed significant improvements in 8-iso (p < 0.001) and 8-OH-dG (p = 0.003), whereas there were no improvements in the CON group. In conclusion, RD decreased biomarkers of OS during 12 weeks of RD exercise in MCI. These results indicate that in MCI, RD could improve lipid peroxidation and DNA oxidation by 8-iso and 8-OH-dG, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".