Effect of plasma‐activated water treatment on physicochemical and functional properties of whey protein isolate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Plasma‐activated water (PAW) is an emerging nonthermal processing method explored for its food disinfection properties. However, the effect of reactive species in PAW on the food composition has not yet been studied. In this study, a simple protein, whey protein isolate (WPI) was used to understand the effect of PAW reactive species on its physicochemical and functional properties. The results showed mild oxidation of WPI evidenced from the decrease in the sulfhydryl group content and increase in the surface hydrophobicity. Increase in the soluble protein content was observed with PAW 45 min treatment. Foam stability of the PAW‐treated samples increased significantly following PAW treatment. However, no linear change in WPI properties was observed with PAW treatment time. Reduction in the thermal stability of samples was observed in 10 and 50 mg mL −1 concentrations with PAW treatment. The SDS‐PAGE analysis revealed that PAW treatment did not form in‐soluble protein aggregation in WPI samples. FTIR spectrum of the treated WPI samples showed that there were no new functional groups formed by the PAW treatment. Increase in β‐sheet, random coil percentage and reduction in α‐helix percentage was observed in 5 mg mL −1 concentration. The results suggest that the reactive oxygen species in the PAW lead to mild oxidation and unfolding of the WPI samples and improved its foam stability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".