Analysis of KRAS Mutations in Gastrointestinal Tract Adenocarcinomas Reveals Site-Specific Mutational Signatures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adenocarcinomas of the luminal gastrointestinal tract and pancreatobiliary system often show histologic and immunohistochemical overlap, making delineation of the primary site in a metastatic setting difficult. Previous studies have shown that site-specific missense mutations in the oncogene KRAS could be used in conjunction with immunohistochemistry to differentiate metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma from primary lung adenocarcinoma. In this study, we assessed the patterning of KRAS mutations across sites in the gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary system. By integrating sequencing data from 44 separate studies, we assessed 2523 KRAS mutations in 7382 distinct cases of adenocarcinoma, including those from the esophagus, stomach, ampulla, biliary system, pancreas, and colon. We found that gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas demonstrate a marked regional variation in the frequency of KRAS mutations, with the most frequent KRAS mutation observed in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (up to 94.9%), whereas the frequency is much lower in adenocarcinomas from the esophagus and stomach (5.4% and 8.7%, respectively). Intriguingly, the pattern of missense mutations showed site specificity as well, with c.35G>T (p.G12V) and c.34G>C (p.G12R) mutations enriched in pancreatic primaries and codon 13 and non-codon 12/13 alterations enriched in gastric primaries (specificity of 98.9% and 93.2%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 93.6% and 92.93% against pancreatic adenocarcinoma). Furthermore, we found that esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas show an enrichment in transitional mutations, whereas other sites showed an equal distribution. Importantly, the examination of a validation cohort from our own institution revealed similar trends. These findings indicate that, in addition to providing therapeutic and diagnostic information, KRAS mutational analysis may also prove useful in delineating the site of origin in gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas that share morphologic and immunohistochemical overlap. Moreover, transitional mutations are more frequent in esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas, reiterating the role of chronic inflammation in the pathogenesis of foregut adenocarcinomas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".