MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315482696 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-18471-0_27

Landslide Inventory Map of the Valemount Area, British Columbia, Canada. A Detailed Methodological Description

2023· book-chapter· en· W4315482696 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Txomin Bornaetxea, A Blais-Stevens, Brendan Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress in landslide research and technology · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersOffice of Energy Research and DevelopmentNatural Resources CanadaEuskal Herriko UnibertsitateaSimon Fraser UniversityEusko Jaurlaritza
KeywordsLandslideOrthophotoCartographyDigital elevation modelElevation (ballistics)GeographyBaseline (sea)Remote sensingPhysical geographyGeologyEnvironmental resource managementGeomorphologyEnvironmental scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Landslides are a recurring geomorphological process in high mountainous areas like Valemount in the Canadian Rocky Mountains, British Columbia. The compilation of detailed information about the spatial distribution and characteristics of past landslides is essential for assessing future potential hazards. To provide baseline geoscience information to stakeholders and decision-makers, we carried out a landslide inventory that covers roughly 1200 km 2 . Using visual interpretation of aerial orthophotos, a digital elevation model of 5 × 5 m resolution and satellite imagery, we compiled up to 1286 landslides and classified them into 11 categories and three levels of certainty. The current paper describes the mapping methodology and summarizes our results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress in landslide research and technologySame topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207