MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315487895 · doi:10.16995/dscn.8085

Part I — Introduction: Social Physics and the VESPACE Project

2023· article· en· W4315487895 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeffrey M. Leichman, Ben Samuel

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Studies / Le champ numérique · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Games
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesDigital humanitiesArtSociologyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article introduces the VESPACE project, an international, multi-disciplinary digital humanities initiative to build a computer-mediated playable simulation—a video game—of the eighteenth-century Paris Fair theatre. As part of this project, a weeklong postgraduate workshop was convened by the authors in May 2020 to develop protocols and procedures for coding literary and historical data for the Ensemble social physics engine that will govern behaviour of NPCs in the interactive model. This article lays out the history and theory of social physics, the potential impacts of this project on historiographic practice, and the methodology and outcomes of the workshop week. We conclude with a discussion of lessons learned and promising leads with respect to the future of applying social physics to humanities research. [This article is part of the collection Computer Modelling and Simulation for Literary-Historical Research: VESPACE and Social Physics.]Cet article présente le projet VESPACE, une initiative pluridisciplinaire internationale dans le domaine des humanités numériques qui vise à construire une simulation ludique – un jeu vidéo – basée sur le Théâtre de Foire parisien au XVIIIe siècle. En mai 2020, les auteurs de cet article organisèrent un atelier postdoctoral d’une semainedans le but de développer des protocoles et des procédures de codage de données littéraires et historiques pour le moteur de physique sociale Ensemble, qui règle le comportement des personnages non joueurs (PNJ) dans le modèle interactif. Cet article présente l’histoire et la théorie de la physique sociale, les impacts potentiels de ce projet sur la pratique historiographique, ainsi que la méthodologie et les résultats de la semaine d’atelier. Nous concluons par une discussion des leçons apprises et des perspectives prometteuses pour l’avenir de l’application de la physique sociale dans la recherche en sciences humaines. [Cet article fait partie de la collection Modélisation et simulation informatiques pour la recherche littéraire-historique : VESPACE et physique sociale.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Studies / Le champ numériqueSame topicArtificial Intelligence in GamesFrench-language works237,207