MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315559974 · doi:10.1215/00265667-9992999

The Pigeon King

2022· article· en· W4315559974 on OpenAlex
Ace Clamber

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMinnesota Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconCitationDownloadLibrary scienceSearch engine optimizationVisual artsMedia studiesHistoryArtWorld Wide WebSociologyComputer scienceSearch engine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Other| November 01 2022 The Pigeon King Ace Clamber Ace Clamber Ace Clamber is a Calgary-based writer whose work explores the intimate day-to-day moments of growing into and navigating adulthood as a trans man. He is fascinated by the everyday, the things everyone can all relate to. He is hopeful that by telling these stories, he can help shape the kinds of trans stories that are told, pushing beyond narratives that center trauma and violence. He was a participant of the Banff Centre for Arts and Creativity Fall 2021 Writers Residency. His first film project, Scaring Women at Night, was an official selection of the 2022 Toronto International Film Festival’s (TIFF) Short Cuts program. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google the minnesota review (2022) 2022 (99): 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1215/00265667-9992999 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Ace Clamber; The Pigeon King. the minnesota review 1 November 2022; 2022 (99): 33–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00265667-9992999 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll Journalsthe minnesota review Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2022 Ace Clamber2022 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal Issue Section: Creative You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it