The New Woman of the Early Twentieth Century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Who was the New Woman of the early twentieth century and what did she signify? Was it a constructed trope or a lived reality? How did this personified image differ in the early years of the twentieth century from the New Woman of the Weimar Republic in Germany or the First Republic in Austria? And what did it mean to be new? How was the “new” perceived compared with the “old,” that is, how did the New Woman compare to the generations of women who came before? Much of the scholarship on the image of New Woman in German-speaking contexts has concentrated on the New Woman in the Weimar Republic in Germany as expressed through literature, film, pop culture, as well as real people in their daily lives of work and leisure. With greater access to birth control, increased employment opportunities, voting rights, and new forms of entertainment and amusement, women in the Weimar Republic lived life differently from those women who came before them. Julia Roos, for example, describes the New Woman as not only sexually liberated, but as “young, unmarried, and childless, [who] earned her own income, and wore her hair cropped short in the androgynous Bubikopf (pageboy) style.” Helen Boak also reaffirms the image of the economically dependent and sexually liberated New Woman with her Bubikopf and “short skirt over her androgynous figure,” while also explaining that this construct of the New Woman was complex, multifaceted, and dynamic rather than static. Not only did the image of the New Woman proliferate broadly through advertising, film, and photography, but, according to Katie Sutton, it was “rarely understood as a single or homogenous [ sic ] ‘type.’” The image of the New Woman in the Weimar Republic was taken up across socioeconomic classes and signified a blurring of gender that also affected men as well as women. Furthermore, it challenged heteronormative structures and expectations, especially in conjunction with the sex-reform movements, particularly the work of the homosexual-rights advocate Magnus Hirschfeld and his work on transgender issues, cross-dressing, and the “Third Sex.” Yet, although the construction of the New Woman has been most widely studied in the context of the German Weimar Republic, it was not limited to that time or place.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".