MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315570849 · doi:10.1080/01942638.2022.2158054

Baseline Range of Motion, Strength, Motor Function, and Participation in Youth with Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome

2023· article· en· W4315570849 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julie Malloy, Emily Berry, Annette Correia, Maria A. Fragala-Pinkham, Sarah Coucci, Susan Riley, J. Spratt, Jessica Knight Pfaffinger, Rachel Ehrbar, Ralph B. D’Agostino, Ellen B. Gurary, Leslie B. Gordon, Monica E. Kleinman

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsPhysical medicine and rehabilitationGrip strengthRange of motionBalance (ability)Physical therapyGross motor skillActivities of daily livingMedicineMotor skillPsychologyGerontologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Limited information is available on impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions in youth with Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS), a rare genetic premature aging disease. The purposes were to: (1) describe range of motion (ROM), grip, pinch and quadriceps strength, functional balance, walking endurance, and gross motor limitations and participation restrictions; (2) evaluate the association between ROM impairments and age; and (3) evaluate the association between the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM) scores and lower extremity (LE) ROM, quadriceps strength, and age. METHODS: Upper and LE ROM, grip, pinch and quadriceps strength, Timed Up and Go (TUG), Six Minute Walk Test, GMFM-88, and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure data were recorded for 38 participants with HGPS. RESULTS: All youth exhibited ROM impairments and most displayed decreased grip and pinch strength, walking endurance, and gross motor skills when compared to same-aged peers. However, the majority had good functional balance with TUG scores in the normal range. Participation restrictions included difficulty keeping up with peers when walking and difficulty completing activities of daily living. Some ROM measurements were negatively associated with age indicating that older participants had more extensive ROM limitation than younger participants. CONCLUSIONS: Physical and occupational therapists can use this information when evaluating youth with HGPS, designing a plan of care, and providing treatment interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical & Occupational Therapy In PediatricsSame topicNuclear Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207