MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315620622 · doi:10.4103/cjrm.cjrm_61_22

The occasional abdominal paracentesis

2023· article· en· W4315620622 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Peter Hutten‐Czapski

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Rural Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsNOSM University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParacentesisMedicineGeneral surgeryInternal medicineAscites

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article has been peer reviewed. INTRODUCTION Once in a while, there is fluid in the abdomen. Usually, it is ascites from cirrhosis, heart failure or malignancy; it could even be infected. Which is it? (Imaging won't tell you.) A tap could make the diagnosis clear.[1] Can you make your patient more comfortable by draining most of it? Of course you can.[2] EQUIPMENT Portable Ultrasound with abdominal probe and gel Surgical skin prep such as Proviodine 5cc syringe and needles for anaesthetising the tract Xylocaine 1% Sterile drapes and gown #14-gauge IV cannula Three-way stop cock Sample tubes (typically for cells chemistry and cytology) Suction tubing and body of 10cc syringe as an adapter Wall suction with drainage carousel or evacuated vacuum containers PROCEDURE I was trained to do the procedure without imaging. Position the patient on their side. I go lateral to the rectus on the dependent side to avoid injury to the hypogastric artery. Avoid any scarred areas that might have adherent bowel Mark the level of shifting dullness and go dependent to there. These days, I use an ultrasound, as a quick application of the probe will find a deep pocket of ascites for you clear of any vulnerable structure [Figure 1]. I'm old school, so after finding my spot, I mark it on the patient in pen. When doing the procedure, I can watch my hands and the patient, and not the screen. Some practitioners are agile enough to do the job two-handed, when watching the screen, with a sterile ultrasound probe cover (e.g., a sterile glove palm) in one hand and the needle in the other. Use the technique that you are comfortable with Prep a generous area around the mark and drape the patient with sterile drapes Using a small needle raise a skin bleb with 0.5 ml xylocaine [Figure 2] Attach the syringe containing residual 5–10 ml xylocaine to a three-way stop cock and the back end of a 14-gauge intravenous (IV) cannula, infiltrating as you go [Figure 3] Advance the needle slowly into the abdominal cavity alternately injecting local anaesthetic and applying slight suction. I place my finger along the needle to control the insertion [Figure 4] When ascites fluid is aspirated, withdraw the steel needle and syringe from the cannula and replace the stopcock and syringe to draw samples (if desired). The arm of the stopcock always points to the port that is turned off. Note the colour and turbidity of the liquid. If turbid, infection or malignancy may be suspect. If diagnosis is the aim, samples can be drawn for cell count (purple top tube), protein and other chemistries (red top tube), cytology (formalin) and microbiology (usually a sterile urine container) Attach the suction tubing to the unused port on the stopcock. Standard wall suction tubing can be attached to a Luer lock connector with the body of a 10cc syringe [Figure 5] Attach to wall suction and set on regulated low-to-medium suction [Figure 6]. The catheter can be easily displaced when waiting for the fluid to drain. Be careful not to withdraw all the fluids as this might drop the blood pressure. Figure 1: Ultrasound showing large pocket of fluid in black under the probeFigure 2: Freezing the skinFigure 3: The cannula stopcock syringe assemblyFigure 4: TappingFigure 5: Capped adapterFigure 6: Suction collectionCOMPLICATIONS Over a few decades of rural medical practice, I have encountered common complications of blocked needle, kinked needle, needle that gets pulled out and similar incidents that require replacement of the catheter. Occasionally, I have had a persistent fluid leak that may require a purse string closure and pressure dressing. I have never had a patient go hypotensive or bleed, but if that occurs, I would treat with IV saline and potentially albumin. Bleeding from the abdominal wall can be controlled with a figure-of-eight suture. Intra-abdominal bleeding would require laparotomy. CONCLUSION Abdominocentesis can be easily done by the rural generalist physician to provide relief or diagnosis for your patient. Acknowledgments: I thank Dr. Marie Lynn Lacasse who helped with the photography. Financial support and sponsorship: Nil. Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Rural MedicineSame topicLiver Disease and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207