MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Energy Saving on Constrained 12-Leads Real-Time ECG Monitoring

2022· article· en· W4315629690 on OpenAlexaff
Hebatalla Ouda, Abeer Badawi, Hossam S. Hassanein, Khalid Elgazzar

Bibliographic record

VenueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech UniversityQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReal-time computingMicrocontrollerEmbedded systemEnergy (signal processing)BluetoothWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Continuous real-time electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring can detect arrhythmia and provide early warning for heart attacks. Effective power management signals and controlling the mode of operation to reduce the need for full fidelity ECG signal. This work studies the impact of the base-delta compression technique for different cardiac conditions on power consummation. It also aims to evaluate operational strategies and their effect on the battery life when the ECG patch can switch between different operating modes (e.g., varying the number of leads according to the cardiac conditions). We use a binary classifier to inform the decision of switching between different operational strategies. Both scenarios are evaluated in terms of execution time, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) communication airtime, power consumption, and energy-saving ratios on a Texas Instruments CC2650 Micro-controller Unit (MCU). We compare the performance of the base-delta compression and changing the mode of operation scenarios on various cardiac abnormalities. Performance evaluation shows that operational strategies outperforms data compression in power saving for normal ECG readings by a double fold. In contrast, operational strategies incurs an additional overhead of 1011 ms during an abnormal status. However, base-delta satisfies the embedded platform constraints on execution time and airtime with 25 ms and 20 ms, respectively in the MCU environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications ConferenceSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207