Data-Driven Indirect Iterative Learning Control
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, a data-driven indirect iterative learning control (DD-iILC) is presented for a repetitive nonlinear system by taking a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) feedback control in the inner loop. A linear parametric iterative tuning algorithm for the set-point is developed from an ideal nonlinear learning function that exists in theory by utilizing an iterative dynamic linearization (IDL) technique. Then, an adaptive iterative updating strategy of the parameter in the linear parametric set-point iterative tuning law is presented by optimizing an objective function for the controlled system. Since the system considered is nonlinear and nonaffine with no available model information, the IDL technique is also used along with a strategy similar to the parameter adaptive iterative learning law. Finally, the entire DD-iILC scheme is completed by incorporating the local PID controller. The convergence is proved by applying contraction mapping and mathematical induction. The theoretical results are verified by simulations on a numerical example and a permanent magnet linear motor example.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it