MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4315644359 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2451365/v1

The NuroSleeve, A User-Centered 3D Printed Orthosis and Functional Electrical Stimulation System for Individuals with Upper Extremity Impairment

2023· preprint· en· W4315644359 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mehdi Khantan, Mikael Avery, Phyo Thuta Aung, Rachel Marie Zarin, Emma Hammelef, Nabila Shawki, Mijail D. Serruya, Alessandro Napoli

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersThomas Jefferson University
KeywordsActivities of daily livingAssistive technologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationFunctional electrical stimulationOccupational therapyPhysical therapyAssistive deviceMedicineComputer scienceHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Active upper extremity (UE) assistive devices have the potential to restore independent functional movement in individuals with UE impairment due to neuromuscular diseases or injury-induced chronic weakness. Academically fabricated UE assistive devices are not usually optimized for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), whereas commercially available alternatives are prohibitively expensive. Both options are typically difficult to don and doff and are cumbersome for extensive daily use. To overcome these limitations, we have designed, developed, and clinically validated the NuroSleeve, an innovative user-centered UE orthosis. Methods: This study introduces the design, implementation, and clinical evaluation of the NuroSleeve, a user-centered, lightweight, affordable, easy to don and doff 3D-printed UE active orthosis for improving function and independence in individuals living with UE neuromuscular impairment. Our primary goals are to develop a customized active UE brace that individuals with UE impairment can use to perform ADLs and to evaluate the benefits of incorporating the device into occupational therapy sessions. The trial is designed as a prospective, open-label, single-cohort feasibility study of eight-week sessions combined with at-home use of the device and implements an iterative device design process where feedback from participants and therapists inform future design improvements. Results: All participants learned how to independently don, doff, and use the NuroSleeve in ADLs, both in clinical therapy and in their home environments. All participants showed improvements in their Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), which was the primary clinical trial outcome measure. Furthermore, the participants and therapists provided valuable feedback to guide further development. Conclusions: Our results from non-clinical testing and clinical evaluation demonstrate that the NuroSleeve has met performance and safety requirements and effectively improves independent voluntary function during ADLs. The study’s encouraging preliminary findings indicate that the NuroSleeve has met its technical and clinical objectives while improving on the limitations of the existing UE orthoses due to its personalized and flexible approach to hardware and firmware design. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04798378, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04798378, date of registration: March 15, 2021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery→French-language works237,207→