MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315702546 · doi:10.20452/pamw.16408

Variants of autoimmune liver diseases: how to diagnose? how to treat?

2023· review· en· W4315702546 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Maciej K. Janik, Ewa Wunsch, Piotr Milkiewicz

Bibliographic record

VenuePolskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnętrznej · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWarszawski Uniwersytet MedycznyAlberta Innovates - Health Solutions
KeywordsAutoimmune hepatitisPrimary sclerosing cholangitisMedicinePathologicalDiseaseMedical diagnosisIncidence (geometry)Liver diseaseIntensive care medicineInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Variants of autoimmune liver diseases: diagnosis and treatment 1 2 different AILDs can be diagnosed, a phenomenon that has been initially called an overlap syndrome.In 2011, the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group stated that even if a patient presents with the features of 2 diseases, for example, AIH and PSC, the final diagnosis should be made based on the predominant features and called the variant of the leading disease.15 A proper diagnosis of an AILD variant is challenging.In contrast to the widely accepted diagnostic criteria for AIH, PBC, and PSC, there is still a lack of well -defined, validated, and internationally agreed upon criteria for these variants.In fact, a large proportion of patients with the features of an overlap syndrome can be easily diagnosed with 2 different AILDs, usually AIH with PSC or PBC, by using current diagnostic criteria for each disease separately.This fact creates a treatment dilemma, as the diagnosis of AIH usually requires starting immunosuppression therapy, 4 whereas these drugs are not recommended for classic PSC and PBC.As mentioned above, the leading component of the disease variant should define its first -line therapy.16 Consequently, there is no clear consensus on how to Introduction Autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs), such as autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), are classified as rare diseases; however, their incidence is growing.These chronic inflammatory liver diseases are associated with a plethora of physical and mental complaints, even at their early stages, 1-3 and may lead to progressive liver fibrosis and eventually liver cirrhosis.4-6 The classic AILDs have all been well -defined in American and European clinical guidelines 4-9 in terms of the type of liver injury, the prevalence of autoantibodies, histological findings, and changes in bile duct imaging studies (TAbLE 1).However, these heterogenic diseases tend to share several common features, and thus, each entity may exhibit symptoms, histological patterns, or the presence of antibodies that are typical of other AILDs (TAbLE 2).Additionally, there are genetic risk factors that are common to all AILDs, such as SH2B3, 10 -13 a non -HLA susceptibility marker that was reported to increase the risk of developing AIH, PSC, PBC, and other autoimmune diseases, for example, type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolskie Archiwum Medycyny WewnętrznejSame topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207