One-Pot Sequential Hydroamination Protocol for N-Heterocycle Synthesis: One Method To Access Five Different Classes of Tri-Substituted Pyridines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tri-substituted pyridines are important scaffolds that can be found in a plethora of commercially available drugs. A one-pot general method for the selective synthesis of less explored/challenging patterns of tri-substituted pyridines is described. Hydroamination of alkynes with commercially available N -triphenylsilylamine generates N -silylenamines. These in situ generated N -silylenamines, upon reaction with α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds and subsequent oxidation, furnish 25 examples of selectively substituted 2,4,5-, 2,3,4-, 3,4,5-, 2,3,5-, and 2,3,6-trisubstituted pyridines in up to 78% yield. The reaction features high functional group compatibility providing an expeditious and general approach for the assembly of selectively substituted tri-substituted pyridine derivatives. The robustness and practicality of the reaction have been demonstrated in a gram-scale reaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".