MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315779886 · doi:10.1063/5.0134998

Exact solutions for flow through porous media with the Klinkenberg effect

2023· article· en· W4315779886 on OpenAlexafffund
Marek Stastna, Andrew P. Grace, Travis Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP Advances · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and Innovation
KeywordsExact solutions in general relativityConservative vector fieldMathematicsFlow (mathematics)Nonlinear systemPorous mediumMathematical analysisDarcy's lawStream functionReal gasCompressibilityMechanicsPhysicsGeometryChemistryPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of gas compressibility during flow through a porous medium modifies the governing equation for pressure, and for low pressures, this leads to the so-called Klinkenberg effect. Darcy’s law remains unchanged, and accounting for the equation of state leads to a parabolic governing equation for pressure. The increased flow rate at low pressure modifies the nonlinearity of this governing equation. We present two broad approaches for constructing exact solutions to the steady state problem. First, geometric reduction is employed to construct exact solutions in Cartesian and polar coordinates. Next, the governing equation is interpreted so that a stream function exists for the flow, and this is used to demonstrate that solutions can only be found when the flow is irrotational. A second, rather broad, class of exact solutions is thus constructed from potential flows and their generalization for variable permeability cases. The latter leads to a non-constant coefficient problem, and we provide both an algorithm illustrating how to use an existing linear numerical solver to solve the nonlinear problem and an explicit exact solution for an annular domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP AdvancesSame topicHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous MediaFrench-language works237,207