Eco Aspects in Revitalisation Tenement Housing Quarters in Szczecin (PL)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter is trying to answers on question: how the sustainable development influence on designing of revitalization process, especially for tenement housing quarters in downtowns of the cities?. Residential quarters from the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries remain an important part of existing urban tissue, particularly in large cities, in Poland as in other European countries. Tenement housing was constructed for the middle and lower social classes. The frontal tenement houses had large, comfortable flats, whereas the annexes had small, substandard flats with no amenities. Living conditions and the living environment must be improved immediately, particularly for flats located within quarters. The proposal to demolish entire inside quarters and replace them with green and recreational areas is a mistake. The sustainable development paradigm has altered people's perceptions of nineteenth-century quarters and how to improve them. According to sustainable development theory, social, economic, and environmental issues are all intertwined. They all have an effect on the architecture, and thus on the spatial and technical arrangements that are used. Ecological aspects of the revitalisation process have a significant impact on both large-scale planning solutions and small-scale architectural, technical, and material solutions used in specific buildings or flats. The most important ecological aspects for architectural design and revitalization are energy-related, material-related, and space-related, or better time-space-related, where the entire life cycle is examined. The presented works of the author and especially the fallowing implementation of an ecological renovation of a Turzyn Quarter in Szczecin are the showcase of the material and non-material benefits for people and environment, which are brought by such an approach to revitalisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".