Android Based Material to Teach Early Reading for Primary Students using Construct 2 Apps
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Android based teaching material can facilitate students and teacher in the inside and outside classroom learning using smartphone. This study aims to investigate the ways in utilizing construct 2 apps to create android based material to teach early reading for primary students. This study is qualitative research in form of explorative case study which includes students in private and public primary schools at five regencies of Indonesia. The research data is collected using questionnaire and interview. It is analyzed using content analysis. The results of study show that android based material of early reading can be created by utilizing three steps. The conclusion of this study is that android based material of early reading is firstly created by investigating the need of material for primary students. Secondly, it creates the concepts of materials by preparing the material compositions, creating material order, and creating teaching material tools. Thirdly, construct 2 apps is utilized to make the teaching materials based on the concepts by creating parts of learning guide, invitation for praying, materials, evaluation, and games.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it