Terrestrial lichen caribou forage transplant success: year 5 and 6 results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The southern mountain caribou—a subpopulation of caribou found in British Columbia—is listed on Schedule 1 of the Federal Species at Risk Act as Threatened. Woodland caribou are diet specialists, relying on Cladonia subgenus Cladina lichen as a primary food source during winter months. Lichens are burned along with trees and other vegetation during stand‐replacing wildfire events, a natural disturbance in caribou ranges. In an attempt to accelerate the return of post‐fire forests to productive caribou winter terrestrial lichen habitat, this study examined the survival and cover of three species of transplanted lichens in a post‐wildfire environment in north central British Columbia, Canada, both with and without forest litter amendments. Chlorophyll fluorescence was used to evaluate lichen survival by measuring potential photosynthetic activity. The results of this study demonstrate that transplanted fragments and mats of Cladonia subgenus Cladina had survived 5 and 6 years after being transplanted within a post‐wildfire environment, and had significantly greater percent cover when compared to the controls. The Fv/Fm results indicated that transplanted lichens survived, regardless of species, propagule type, or whether amendments were applied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".