MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315864682 · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2023.115252

Validation of a fast and sensitive UPLC-MS/MS quantitative method for N-acyl taurine analysis in biological samples

2023· article· en· W4315864682 on OpenAlexaff
Gianna Falascina, Laure B. Bindels, Vincenzo Di Marzo, Adele Cutignano

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAldose Reductase and Taurine
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryNatTaurineChromatographyRepeatabilityDetection limitHigh-performance liquid chromatographyQuantitative analysis (chemistry)Mass spectrometryBiochemistryAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent discovery of N-acyl taurines (NATs) as a class of endogenous bioactive lipids and the perspective of their possible pharmacological applications stimulated the development of mass spectrometry-based methods for their quantitative measurements in biological tissues and fluids. We report here for the first time a procedure validated both in liver surrogate matrix and neat solvent (MeOH) based on UPLC-ESI-QqQ analysis for the identification and quantification of NATs in biological tissue extracts. The LC-MS method was based on five representative lipid analogues, including saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated species, namely N-palmitoyl taurine (C16:0 NAT), N-oleoyl taurine (C18:1 NAT), N-arachidonoyl taurine (C20:4 NAT), N-docosanoyl taurine (C22:0 NAT) and N-nervonoyl taurine (C24:1 NAT), and evaluated for specificity, linearity, matrix effect, recovery, repeatability and intermediate precision and accuracy. The method validated in MeOH by internal standard approach (d4-C20:4 NAT) showed excellent linearity in the range 1–300 ng/ml with R always ≥ 0.9996 for all NATs; intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy were always within the acceptable range. Specificity was assessed on NAT standards in MeOH, applying the confirmation ratio of two diagnostic MRM ion transitions for product ions at m/z 80 and m/z 107 to true samples in the adopted BEH C18 UPLC conditions. Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 0.3–0.4 and 1 ng/ml, respectively, for all compounds. The method was successfully applied to assess the levels of NATs in the mouse liver and, for the first time, in varying sections of the intestine (duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon). NAT levels increased from duodenum to colon, evidencing a remarkable prevalence in the large intestine of C22:0 NAT, typically occurring mainly in the central nervous system. These findings prompt further studies to disclose the biological function of the various members of this class in different peripheral tissues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical AnalysisSame topicAldose Reductase and TaurineFrench-language works237,207