MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4315927783 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00494.2022

Improving the inclusion of transgender and nonbinary individuals in the planning, completion, and mobilization of cardiovascular research

2023· editorial· en· W4315927783 on OpenAlexaff
Chantal L. Rytz, Lauren B. Beach, Nathalie Saad, Sandra M. Dumanski, David Collister, Amelia M. Newbert, Lindsay Peace, Elle Lett, Dina N. Greene, Paul Connelly, Jaimie F. Veale, Cris Morillo, Sofia B. Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsAIDS VancouverLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)TransgenderCardiovascular healthPsychological interventionMedicineMobilizationDiseaseHealth careGerontologyIntensive care medicinePolitical scienceNursingPsychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Transgender and nonbinary (TNB) individuals face unclear but potentially significant cardiovascular health inequities, yet no TNB-specific evidence-based interventions for cardiovascular risk reduction currently exist. To address this gap, we propose a road map to improve the inclusion of TNB individuals in the planning, completion, and mobilization of cardiovascular research. In doing so, the adoption of inclusive practices would optimize cardiovascular health surveillance and care for TNB communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0320.046
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyFrench-language works237,207