LMS-based continuous reference percentiles for 14 laboratory parameters in the CALIPER cohort of healthy children and adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Marked physiological changes in growth and development present challenges in defining pediatric reference intervals for biomarkers of health and disease. Lambda, Mu, and Sigma (LMS)-based statistical modeling provides a continuous normal distribution by negating skewness and variation, and is commonly used to establish growth charts. Such LMS reference curves are suggested to enhance laboratory test result interpretation. The current study establishes LMS-based continuous reference percentiles for 14 biomarkers in the CALIPER cohort of healthy children and adolescents. METHODS: Data from healthy children and adolescents aged 1-<19 years were used to establish continuous reference percentiles using a novel LMS-based statistical method, including 2.5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 97.5th percentiles. The LMS approach applies a Box-Cox data transformation and summarizes continuous distributions by age via three curves: skewness (Lambda), median (Mu), and coefficient of variation (Sigma). RESULTS: LMS-based percentiles and z-scores were generated for 14 common pediatric biomarkers that demonstrate dynamic concentration patterns with age (e.g., alkaline phosphatase) and/or wherein the magnitude of difference from the population mean may be clinically relevant (e.g., triglycerides). The LMS model captured age- and sex-specific distributions accurately and was not substantially influenced by outlying points. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to establish LMS-based continuous reference percentiles for biochemical markers in a healthy Canadian pediatric population. The current LMS-based approach builds upon previous continuous reference interval models by providing graded percentiles to improve test result interpretation, particularly with repeated measures over time. This method may assist in facilitating a patient-centered approach to laboratory medicine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".