S751 The Vedolizumab Pregnancy Exposure Registry: An OTIS Pregnancy Study Update
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Vedolizumab is a gut-selective immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody that binds to α4β7 integrin; it is approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in the U.S. and elsewhere. Published studies on the effect of vedolizumab in human pregnancy are limited. Data from the ongoing Vedolizumab Pregnancy Exposure Registry (NCT02678052) in the U.S. and Canada have been collected by the MotherToBaby Pregnancy Studies conducted by the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists (OTIS). This prospective observational pregnancy cohort study planned to enroll and analyze the outcomes of 100 vedolizumab-exposed (Vedo) participants compared to 100 disease-matched (DM) and 100 healthy comparison (HC) participants. Methods: Pregnant women treated with vedolizumab for UC or CD with at least one dose in the first trimester were enrolled in the Vedo group. Pregnant women with UC or CD but no exposure to vedolizumab were enrolled in the DM group. Pregnant women with no exposure to any biologic during pregnancy and not diagnosed with an auto-inflammatory or other exclusionary disease were enrolled in the HC group. Data were collected from telephone interviews and maternal and pediatric medical records; live-born children were followed to one year of age with a dysmorphological examination and developmental screening. The Short Quality of Life in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) was administered to women with CD or UC. Results: Between December 2015 and March 2022, outcomes were collected for 301 women, 98 in the Vedo group, 104 in the DM group, and 99 in the HC group. SIBDQ mean scores were similar in the Vedo group, 5.8 (SD 1.0) and the DM group, 5.9 (SD 1.0). Preliminary descriptive outcome data are shown in Table. In the Vedo group 7.3% of pregnancies resulted in a fetus or infant with a major birth defect, compared to 7.8% in the DM group, and 4.7% in the HC group. No pattern of major birth defects was identified in the Vedo group. Conclusion: The proportion of pregnancies with vedolizumab exposure resulting in a major birth defect are similar to proportions in the disease comparison group, and did not represent a specific pattern. The Vedolizumab Pregnancy Exposure Registry is ongoing with formal statistical analysis planned once the study is completed in 2023. Table 1. - Pregnancy Outcomes in the Study Cohort Vedo-Total(N=98) DM-Total(N=104) HC-Total(N=99) Pregnancies ending with live born infant - n/N (%) 93/98 (94.9) 99/104 (95.2) 85/99 (85.9) Spontaneous abortion – N (Left Truncation Accounted Rate a ) 3 (8.7%) 3 (6.1%) 1 (6.4%) Termination - n/N (%) 0/98 (0.0) 0/104 (0.0) 0/99 (0.0) Stillbirth - n/N (%) 0/98 (0.0) 1/104 (1.0) 0/99 (0.0) Lost to follow-up (LTFU) - n/N (%) 2/98 (2.0) 1/104 (1.0) 13/99 (13.1) Preterm delivery – N (Rate b ) 13 (14.5%) 6 (6.1%) 6 (7.2%) Birth weight full term infants – mean g (SD) 3410.4 (436.7) 3428.8 (454.0) 3308.1 (432.3) Number of pregnancies with major birth defects among all pregnancies excluding LTFU – n/N’ (%) 7/96 (7.3) 8/103 (7.8) 4/86 (4.7) Serious infections in live born infants up to 1 year of age – n/N’(%) c 3/97 (3.1) 2/99 (2.0) 1/88 (1.1) Ages and Stages Screening at 1 year of age with concern – n/N’ (%) c 10/66 (15.2) 20/87 (23.0) 11/59 (18.6) aSpontaneous abortion rate computed using Fleming-Harrington estimate at 20 weeks' gestation, accounting for left truncation because women can enroll at various times in gestation;bComputed using Fleming-Harrington estimate at 37 weeks' gestation;cIncludes twins; % = (n/N') * 100. N' at each category: Number of pregnancies meeting the criteria specified in the row title.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".