MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S817 The Effect of Guselkumab Induction Therapy on Inflammatory Biomarkers in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: QUASAR Phase 2b Induction Results Through Week 12

2022· article· en· W4316086168 on OpenAlexaff
Gary R. Lichtenstein, Axel Dignaß, William J. Sandborn, K H G Huang, Matthew Germinaro, Rebbecca Wilson, Hongyan Zhang, Baili Chen, Minhu Chen, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Brian G. Feagan, Julián Panés, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGastroenterologyInternal medicineCalprotectinUlcerative colitisPlaceboVedolizumabInflammatory bowel diseaseRandomizationC-reactive proteinRandomized controlled trialDiseaseInflammationPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FeCal) are non-invasive inflammatory biomarkers used to assess disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Here we report inflammatory biomarker results through Week 12 for QUASAR (NCT04033445) Phase 2b Induction. QUASAR is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of guselkumab (GUS), an interleukin-23 p19 subunit antagonist, in patients with moderately to severely active UC who had an inadequate response or intolerance to conventional (ie, thiopurines or corticosteroids) or advanced therapy (ie, tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonists, vedolizumab, or tofacitinib). Methods: Patients with moderately to severely active UC (defined as a modified Mayo score of 5 to 9, inclusive with a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore ≥ 1 and a Mayo endoscopy subscore ≥ 2 obtained at baseline [BL]) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive IV GUS 200 mg, 400 mg, or placebo at Weeks 0, 4, and 8. CRP and FeCal were assessed at BL and through Week 12. Results: Three hundred thirteen patients were included in the analysis; approximately 50% had a history of inadequate response/intolerance to advanced therapies. Median BL CRP and FeCal concentrations were similar across treatment groups. Greater median reductions in CRP and FeCal were observed at the earliest timepoint assessed (Week 4) with GUS and continued to Week 12 compared with placebo (Table). Median changes from BL to Week 12 in CRP were -1.86 mg/L for the combined GUS group compared with 0.06 mg/L for placebo (nominal p< 0.001). Median changes from BL to Week 12 in FeCal were -684.00 mg/kg and 0.00 mg/kg for the combined GUS group and placebo, respectively (nominal p< 0.001). At Week 12, higher proportions of patients treated with GUS compared with placebo had normalized CRP ≤3 mg/L (44.2% vs 18.8%, nominal p< 0.001), and normalized FeCal ≤250 mg/kg (33.0% vs 9.9%, nominal p< 0.001), respectively, among patients with abnormal CRP or FeCal at BL. Conclusion: Patients with moderately to severely active UC who received GUS IV induction treatment had greater reductions in CRP and FeCal concentrations through Week 12 compared with placebo with no dose dependent effect for GUS 200 mg and 400 mg. Reductions in CRP and FeCal were observed as early as Week 4 with GUS and continued to Week 12. Higher proportions of patients had normalized CRP and normalized FeCal levels at Week 12 with GUS compared with placebo. Table 1. - Change from baseline in CRP and FeCal concentrations through Week 12 Placebo IV(N=105) Guselkumab 200 mg IV (N=101) Guselkumab 400 mg IV(N=107) Guselkumab Combined (N=208) CRP (mg/L) Baseline, NMedian (IQR) 1054.89 (1.35; 10.80) 994.31 (1.61; 17.80) 1044.38 (1.88; 8.81) 2034.37 (1.74; 11.90) Change from baseline at Week 4, NMedian (IQR) 1040.00 (-1.32, 1.37) 98-2.18 (-8.60;-0.28)** 101-1.15 (-5.45; -0.06)** 199-1.45 (-6.69; -0.17)** Change from baseline at Week 8, NMedian (IQR) 1030.00 (-2.49; 1.74) 94-2.60 (-9.30; -0.39)** 102-1.55 (-4.80; -0.18)** 196-2.10 (-7.49; -0.23)** Change from baseline at Week 12, NMedian (IQR) 1020.06 (-2.23; 2.94) 97-2.31 (-8.20; -0.33)** 100-1.06 (-4.76; 0.07)** 197-1.86 (-6.28; -0.06)** FeCal (mg/kg) Baseline, NMedian (IQR) 911457.00(749.00; 3054.00) 951667.00(771.00; 2859.00) 1011578.00(811.00; 2860.00) 196 1619.50(791.00; 2859.50) Change from baseline at Week 4, NMedian (IQR) 89-116.00(-830.00; 812.00) 89-358.00 (-1641.00; 226.00) 95-391.00 (-1301.00; 167.00)* 184-378.00 (-1503.00;207.00)* Change from baseline at Week 12, NMedian (IQR) 770.00(-855.00; 1089.00) 82-745.00(-1946.00; 0.00)** 88-558.50(-1426.00; -12.50)** 170-684.00 (-1682.00, -10.00)** Patients who had a prohibited change in UC medication, an ostomy or colectomy, or discontinued study agent due to lack of efficacy or an AE of worsening of UC prior to the designated timepoint had their baseline value carried forward from the time of the event onward. Data after a discontinuation of study agent due to COVID-19 related reasons (excluding COVID 19 infection) were considered to be missing.*Nominal P< 0.05**Nominal P< 0.001

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→