S754 Impact of Mirikizumab Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Crohn’s Disease: A Phase 2 Study Analysis Using the SF-36
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: This analysis evaluated Mirikizumab (miri) effects on Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in the Phase (Ph)2 randomised, double-blind, parallel, placebo (PBO)-controlled study in patients (pts) with moderately-to-severely active Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods: 12-Week(W) Induction: 191 pts were randomized 2:1:1:2 to 4 treatment arms: intravenous (IV) PBO, 200, 600, or 1000mg miri every 4 weeks (Q4W; W0, 4, and 8). 40-W Maintenance: For miri induction dose, pts achieving ≥1-point improvement in Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) at W12 were re-randomized 1:1 to double-blind maintenance treatment from W12 to W48: continuation of induction IV treatment assignment (IV-IV; N=41) or subcutaneous (SC) 300mg miri Q4W (IV-SC; N=46). Due to small sample sizes, maintenance IV arms and SC arms were pooled. W12 SES-CD non-improvers (N=30) and pts receiving PBO during induction (N=59) received IV 1000mg miri Q4W from W12 to W48. No statistical comparisons were made between miri treatment groups in the maintenance period. SF-36 was assessed at baseline and at W4,12,16, 24, 32, 44, and 52. Results: Statistically significant improvement in MCS was observed at W4 (600mg dose level) and at W12 (all dose levels), whereas statistically significant improvements in PCS were observed only at W12 (600 and 1000mg dose levels) compared to PBO (Table). Though statistical comparisons were not made between treatment groups during maintenance, comparison of mean changes in MCS and PCS suggest that improvements during induction were sustained or further numerically increased with miri maintenance treatment, even in induction SES-CD non-improvers (Table). Conclusion: These data show that miri treatment improves health related quality of life in pts with moderately to severely active CD and suggest an earlier impact on mental compared to physical wellbeing. Maintenance treatment effects were numerically consistent or increased compared to induction effects, even among more refractory pts. These findings will be validated in the ongoing miri Ph3 CD study (NCT03926130). Proinflammatory signals can induce anxiety and depressive symptoms; better understanding of how the effects of anti-inflammatory treatment on the gut-brain axis may improve mental and physical subjective wellbeing requires additional mechanistic studies. Table 1. - Effect of mirikizumab on SF-36 MCS and PCS Change from Baseline Mental Component Score (MCS) Physical Component Score (PCS) Induction Period PBO (N=64) 200 mg IV miri (N=31) 600 mg IV miri (N=32) 1000 mg IV miri (N=64) PBO (N=64) 200 mg IV miri (N=31) 600 mg IV miri (N=32) 1000 mg IV miri (N=64) W0 Baseline (Mean ± SD) 37.0 ± 13.2 35.2 ± 10.2 41.1 ± 10.4 40.4 ± 11.6 38.9 ± 8.3 38.4 ± 6.4 42.9 ± 7.8 39.5 ± 8.6 W4 CFBL (LSM ± SE) 1.9 ± 1.0 2.6 ± 1.4 5.2 ± 1.4* 3.1 ± 1.0 2.4 ± 0.7 3.3 ± 1.0 3.4 ± 1.0 4.2 ± 0.7 W12 CFBL (LSM ± SE) 2.3 ± 1.1 7.5 ± 1.6* 6.5 ± 1.6* 6.1 ± 1.2* 3.1 ± 0.8 4.7 ± 1.1 8.0 ± 1.1** 6.7 ± 0.8** Maintenance Period PBO-1000 mg IV miri (N=59) NI-1000 mg IV miri (N=30) All IV-IV miri (N=41) All IV-SC miri (N=46) PBO-1000 mg IV miri (N=59) NI-1000 mg IV miri (N=30) All IV-IV miri (N=41) All IV-SC miri (N=46) W0 Baseline (Mean ± SD) 37.2 ±13.0 38.0 ±11.2 42.0 ± 10.1 38.7 ±10.7 39.5 ± 8.1 40.8 ± 8.3 41.1 ± 8.5 38.1 ± 7.1 W24 CFBL (Mean ± SD) 7.4 ± 8.7 7.7 ± 11.7 7.0 ± 10.6 5.9 ± 13.1 6.8 ± 7.3 7.1 ± 7.8 9.6 ± 5.6 7.1 ± 8.3 W52 CFBL (Mean ± SD) 7.1 ± 10.6 7.3 ± 9.8 8.5 ± 11.3 11.5 ± 11.4 9.9 ± 7.2 7.1 ± 8.2 10.2 ± 8.7 10.7 ± 7.9 Abbreviations: CFBL = change from baseline; IV = intravenous; IV-IV = pooled maintenance IV treatment arms for patients at each miri induction dose level who achieved ≥1-point improvement in SES-CD at W12 who were re-randomized to continued induction IV treatment assignment during maintenance; IV-SC = pooled maintenance SC treatment arms for patients at each miri induction dose level who achieved ≥1-point improvement in SES-CD at W12 who were re-randomized to SC 300mg miri Q4W during maintenance; LSM = least squares mean; NI = SES-CD non-improver (a patient who received miri during induction who did not achieve a ≥1-point improvement in SES-CD at W12); PBO = placebo; SC = subcutaneous; SD = standard deviation; SE = standard error; W = week. For statistical comparisons across induction treatment groups, a mixed model for repeated measures was used. The model includes treatment, region, prior biologic CD therapy used, baseline, visit and baseline by visit, and treatment by visit.p-values versus PBO: *p< 0.05; ** p≤0.001. Bolded values are statistically different versus PBO.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".