The Impact of Diabetic Foot Ulcer on Individuals' Lives and Daily Routine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) on individuals' lives and daily routines. DESIGN: Qualitative design informed by social constructivism and symbolic interactionism frameworks. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The sample comprised 30 individuals attending a wound care clinic in Southeast Ontario, Canada. Most participants (n = 17) were between the ages of 65 and 92 years, were male (n = 20), married (n = 21), living with their family (n = 23), and had completed high school (n = 26). METHODS: One-to-one semistructured interviews were conducted by the first author until saturation of each emerging theme was achieved. Interviews were audio-recorded and lasted from 45 to 90 minutes. Data collection and analysis occurred simultaneously and included intensive semistructured interviews, field notes, and researcher's journal. RESULTS: Participants with DFUs were found to perceive a "sense of life change," impacting their lives across physical, psychological, and social spheres. They reported 4 key themes indicating that DFUs were (1) limiting their outings; (2) restricting leisure activities; (3) impacting personal and social life; and (4) contributing to emotional fluctuations. CONCLUSION: Sense of life changes resulting from DFUs were associated with participant reporting loss of freedom and enjoyment. These findings underscore the need for holistic support for patients with DFUs that simultaneously address physical, psychological, and social needs and areas of impact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".