MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4316362328 · doi:10.3389/esss.2023.10069

Multi-Isotope Geochemical Baseline Study of the Carbon Management Canada Research Institutes CCS Field Research Station (Alberta, Canada), Prior to CO <sub>2</sub> Injection

2023· article· en· W4316362328 on OpenAlex
Rachel Utley, Emma Martin-Roberts, Nicholas Utting, Gareth Johnson, Domokos Györe, Marta Żurakowska, Finlay M. Stuart, Adrian J. Boyce, Thomas H. Darrah, Pauline Gulliver, R. Stuart Haszeldine, Don C. Lawton, Stuart Gilfillan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth Science Systems and Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsCarbon Management CanadaUniversity of CalgaryNatural Resources Canada
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUniversity of LiverpoolCarbon Management CanadaSight Research UKNatural Environment Research CouncilCenovus EnergyUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsGreenhouse gasGroundwaterEnvironmental scienceBaseline (sea)Carbon capture and storage (timeline)Flux (metallurgy)Atmosphere (unit)Coal miningCoalIsotopes of carbonCarbon dioxideCarbon fibersAdvectionGeologyHydrology (agriculture)Climate changeEnvironmental chemistryTotal organic carbonWaste managementMeteorologyChemistryOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an industrial scale mitigation strategy for reducing anthropogenic CO 2 from entering the atmosphere. However, for CCS to be routinely deployed, it is critical that the security of the stored CO 2 can be verified and that unplanned migration from a storage site can be identified. A number of geochemical monitoring tools have been developed for this purpose, however, their effectiveness critically depends on robust geochemical baselines being established prior to CO 2 injection. Here we present the first multi-well gas and groundwater characterisation of the geochemical baseline at the Carbon Management Canada Research Institutes Field Research Station. We find that all gases exhibit CO 2 concentrations that are below 1%, implying that bulk gas monitoring may be an effective first step to identify CO 2 migration. However, we also find that predominantly biogenic CH 4 (∼90%–99%) is pervasive in both groundwater and gases within the shallow succession, which contain numerous coal seams. Hence, it is probable that any upwardly migrating CO 2 could be absorbed onto the coal seams, displacing CH 4 . Importantly, 4 He concentrations in all gas samples lie on a mixing line between the atmosphere and the elevated 4 He concentration present in a hydrocarbon well sampled from a reservoir located below the Field Research Station (FRS) implying a diffusive or advective crustal flux of 4 He at the site. In contrast, the measured 4 He concentrations in shallow groundwaters at the site are much lower and may be explained by gas loss from the system or in situ production generated by radioactive decay of U and Th within the host rocks. Additionally, the injected CO 2 is low in He, Ne and Ar concentrations, yet enriched in 84 Kr and 132 Xe relative to 36 Ar, highlighting that inherent noble gas isotopic fingerprints could be effective as a distinct geochemical tracer of injected CO 2 at the FRS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it