Introduction of Artemis 1 Nanosatellite Missions and Technology Trends
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Artemis program is a manned lunar exploration plan being pursued by NASA in the United States. It is of great significance that manned lunar exploration has been resumed since Apollo 17. The main partner countries are the European Union (ESA), Japan (JAXA), and Canada (CSA). A total of 22 countries, including Korea, have signed in the Artemis Accords to participate in this program. The first mission of the Artemis program, Artemis 1, is primarily aimed at flight test launch vehicles and spacecraft before full-scale exploration missions. As a secondary mission, 10 nanosatellites mounted on Artemis 1 are deployed and carry out their respective missions. Artemis 1, which is introduced in Korea, consists of only the main mission, and it is very rare to deal with the 10 nanosatellites, making it difficult to understand the scientific and technological mission goals of each nanosatellite. In this paper, the nanosatellite missions of Artemis 1, which have not been introduced in detail in Korea, and the recent trend of nanosatellite development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".